They Say!

 

It is evident that “they say[MM1] ” has become the authority in most people’s minds.  The presumptuous conclusion is that “they” know what they’re talking about.  A common practice in an argument between two common men is to refer to “they say” in order to become the winner of the litigation.  More often than not, the term “they” may be no more than the figments of that persons own fairy tale imaginations to vindicate their own ambitions for argument’s sake.  The mindless babbling of a non founded or unproven argument is frustrating to a sincere and honest person.  It is evident that some people find it amusing by using the term “they say” in order to take control of the popular vote no matter what consequences it actually has on the belief system of an individual. 

 

Scientist

 

The ultimate meaning and justification behind the term “they say” is that you are referring to an individual or group of individuals who have studied the subject in question and presented evidence of a possible conclusion.  In essence you would be referring to a scientist whose study is in that field.  

 

The irritation of most individuals who are presented with false evidence is they don’t know what to believe.  The old adage “consider the source” may be helpful to such a person. In conjunction with this have you ever considered conducting your own experiments and doing your own research in order to arrive to a more accurate understanding of the subject in question?

 

The Government

 

People’s honesty is always called into question because of the driven desire to lie.  The government’s solution was to take control by monitoring people’s contracts, textbooks, and much more and develop a legal system.  This has been effective to a certain extent.  To demand that a person be honest is a good thing.  The only problem with this whole scenario is that the government is made up of people who have the same desires as its subjects.  The ultimate function of a government is to take power and establish order. In order to establish order one must establish its dominance through power, justice, in all honesty to convince the subjects of the desired outcome.

 

What does this have to do with “they say”? The laws that dictate what should be done in society are based on science.  Consider the speed limit, seat belt use, food labeling, and a host of many other laws.  But what happens when the science is wrong?  Have you ever seen a dangerous intersection that needed a traffic light instead of a stop sign?  What would it take to change the law from a stop sign to a traffic light?  Again science is the answer, study the intersection and the effect it has on safety.  In turn you would collect data in order to make an analysis for a possible conclusion or remedy. This of course is a simple explanation of the big picture.  Yet you may encounter a large population of people who enjoy the stop sign instead of the traffic light and will argue with their biased science that the stop sign is sufficient and that a traffic light would be a needless expense on the city.

 

Convictions

 

This in turn leads us into another topic that entails convictions.  In essence a conviction is a belief.  Convictions lead to passionate arguments.  When this arises it is hoped that science can shed the light of truth through acquiring factual data.   In the illustration listed above about the traffic light, it would be important to acquire an arbitrator scientist.  Passionate convictions cloud evidence that should be presented.

 

After the study is acquired and the data analyzed and the evidence is presented, it is plausible that the authorities involved can make an educated decision to resolve the issue.  In turn, when you are having a conversation you can vehemently remark, “That’s what they say!” J

 

Evolution?

 

What does all of this have to do with evolution?  It is apparent that evolution is outside the scope of true science.  As far as the case goes with a traffic light or stop sign, this obviously is a subject that can be studied with conclusive data.  Everything in evolution has a big “IF” and requires a belief system that is astronomically impossible.  Consider this, the basic fundamental in believing evolution is accepting the following statement.  “If there are an indefinite number of possibilities and an indefinite number of chances for the possibilities to happen, they will happen”.  The insanity of this argument is obvious to any reasonable person.  The fact that this statement is accepted is a ridiculous act of blind faith.  Indeed the Evolutionist has a lot more faith than a creationist could ever dream to possess; the only problem with this is that it is blind faith.  The unreasonableness of a person who claims to believe in evolution leads him to be an agnostic; this in turn leads him to be an atheist.

Reason

 

The whole meaning for the existence of science is “reason”.  There has to be a reason why something happens.   If you take this basic fundamental out of science it becomes useless and there’s no point in further study.  Exploring “reason” requires “accepting thought” if you are accepting thought, you are learning from another.  If you do the math the only true mindlessness is Atheism and Evolution.

 

The so-called revolutionary idea of evolution is that everything started out simple and became more complex.  What Evolutionist fail to consider is that they are comparing their own limited thought process with the vast array of the universe.  In our world of development, things do start out simple and we continue to build on that simplicity until it grows into something more complex like a house, car, computer, and the list goes on.  This of course is a learning process that we are all endowed with.  Consider a baby when it is born it is given the basic characteristics for life and learning.  In other words it starts out simple and as it grows it becomes more complex as far as intelligent mind is concerned.  It is assumed by the Evolutionist that since they think this way that that is the way all things work and hence, this so-called revolutionary idea is not so revolutionary after all.  In other words they are still imprisoned by the physical mind.

 

“In the beginning God made…” this is one of the most powerful quotes that has ever existed.  This is also one of the oldest quotes if not the oldest quote that has ever been made and it was not made by an Evolutionist.  Assuredly they have often thought and wondered and asked themselves, “Could it be?” Often it is a sad sight when you see them begging for forgiveness on their death bed, knowing that their whole life they chose to believe a lie on purpose.

 

God

 

It is also apparent that God himself cannot be studied by means of science.  To illustrate this point take for example a house.  Of course it is built by someone and it had a designer.  You could examine the house and its contents and it may give you an indication of what the person is like.  Yet the same person could also designed cars, boats, motorcycles, and the list goes on.  By studying their creation you may catch glimpses of the personality but to actually know that person you would have to meet him.  And if you have questions about the design or the way things were made you can ask him.

 

 

Consider this; the likelihood of everything happening by a chance is less than zero.  Think about what this means.  If you were in the hospital and the Dr. said there is a 0 percent chance that you will live then, more than likely you are going to die.   If your chances were less than zero you would’ve never made it to the hospital to begin with.

 

 

Apparent Conclusion

 

Realistically it must be our resolve to possess an apparent conclusion.  An apparent conclusion is a most reasonable explanation of the data acquired.  Some may argue that this is different terminology for a theory hypothesis.  However a theory does not need evidence, only premonition as in the case of evolution.  An apparent conclusion takes into consideration the evidence presented yet, is humbled enough to admit that although the conclusion is plausible, may be wrong.  There is nothing conclusive or apparent about evolution.

 

Satanic Ingenuity

 

The spellbinding evolutionary agenda manifest itself in the most obscure places.  Children shows and movies even old time classics like”Lady and the Tramp” makes references to the evolutionary agenda.  It permeates our society and is nonchalantly presented as a common fact.  Humanizing animals through cartoons has led to the ridiculous assumption of animal equality with humans.  In fact, the statement has been made that humans are nothing more than animals indicating the animal’s equality to humans.  It is understandable for a human to have compassion upon an animal.  Yet, there is no animal that has the intellectual capacity as a human.  The satanic agenda is simple but the methods are complex.  The mission of Satan has been very clear from the beginning of his career.  His genius and superior intellectual skills far surpass that of any atheist.  It is amazing that an atheist can believe in telepathy yet you cannot convince them that Satan actually puts thoughts into the minds of humans.

 

It is very evident that animals are put here for the enjoyment of humans.  Watching an animal and how it lives is one of the best forms of entertainment the human can enjoy.

 

About Atheist

 

The atheistic populace of mankind lives their lives in denial.  Atheist of course would argue that statement proving it true, ironically, in the first place.  Of course these statements provide a win win situation for the argument.  Yet the statements are founded on fundamental facts about the thought process of an atheist.  The unhealthy assumption embraced by an atheist is that there is no god is denial in itself.  The broad aspect of this unhealthy assumption would be felt in their everyday life.  Apparently the atheist chooses to ignore the spiritual side leaving it numb and hence, it becomes dead.  Their basis for this spiritual suicide is based on their inability to associate god with scientific theories, namely evolution.  Atheists always have the agenda of trying to convince a believer in god of his so-called non existence.  When a person such as an atheist has such an unhealthy passion to argue such insanity, they are only trying to convince themselves.  The firm convictions of a true believer can be put into something a lot more meaningful than trying to communicate with an atheist.

 

About Agnostics

 

Usually an agnostic has no real firm convictions.  In other words they would ignore an apparent conclusion to keep their options open.  The agenda of an agnostic is ridiculous.  If they’re talking to a believer in god they will appear as an atheist, on the other hand if they’re talking to an atheist they will appear as a believer in god.  In their reasoning they feel to keep all possibilities open means that they will never be wrong.  This ridiculous agenda is misleading because an agnostic will only apply this thought process when it comes to questioning god’s existence.  They ignore real facts and refuse to interpret them yet hypocritically they believe if you cut yourself you will bleed.  Indeed keeping up appearances with no commitments is their motto.  Their excuse for this reasoning is that there are no real answers.  Often to communicate with such individuals is a waste of time.

 

Burden of Proof