CHARLES DARWIN?
Was Charles Darwin a man of intelligence and wisdom?? Did he devote his life to making observations of the natural world with no hidden agenda of disbelief in God? Why would observing the natural world naturally convince a man that there was no designer?
Charles
Darwin was a man who liked to appeal to one’s intellectual vanity. Through his collections and various writings
it is evident throughout his observations that the only thing on his mind was
to disprove the existence of god. It is
also very evident from his correspondence with his wife that he was questioning
the existence of a creator. For many
explanations and hypothesis, the theories, guesswork, and so on he felt that he
proved beyond a reasonable doubt that there is no god.
EVOLUTIONIST AGENDA
Most Evolutionists will tell you that when Charles Darwin set out on his journey
to observe the natural world that the only thing on his agenda was observation
and study. But what was the real reason?
It was very evident that Charles Darwin’s father was an atheist. Charles himself was not raised width any real
religious background. In light of this
fact when Charles Darwin made reference to the bible in one situation he was
made fun of by the people he was speaking to.
This was a turning point and Charles Darwin’s life. He says that his atheist viewpoint was slow
and gradual and not painful to him as it was to his wife. Could it be that Charles Darwin never really
believed in god and the first place? He
admired his father and other atheist. He
indeed regarded anyone who is spiritual as a person who lacked intelligence.
He points to all the suffering in the world as evidence of no god but
in all his writings he fails to mention anything about Satan who is also a
Biblical character. If you could entertain this hypothesis that
one person could be the result of much suffering like Hitler, Mussolini, and
so on you can also entertain the hypothesis tha
t Satan who is one person could be the culprit of much suffering and pain.
Could it be that his survival of the fittest is no more than the struggle
of good and evil mentioned in the bible? This presumptuous man only believes that his
idea is better than the bible and its explanation. Indeed, in all his writings the reader is left
unsatisfied, hopeless, and lost. He
even discredits his own spiritual desire by comparing it to a monkey who wants
a banana. In examining 
n god? The pain they go through in
this spiritual suicide is astronomical. But according to Charles Darwin pain is the
reason for living so it would only be logical for him to take the most painful
road. In his writings he refers to
the survival of the fittest by means of pleasure and pain. He fails to realize how he puts himself outside
the scope of his research. Although
being an intellectual he had tunnel vision and considered his observations
but did not consider his observations with his own intellectual capacity to
understand them.
existence of god. Charles Darwin also thought that since there
were so many different religions from Hindus, Buddhist, and others that this is
proof of the nonexistence of god. He
continues to leave Satan out of the equation.
Again the question arises can one person mislead nation’s and belief and
thought in god? This fact has already
been proven. Why do people have a hard
time accepting simple explanations? It
seems that everyone is a conspiracy theorist like Charles Darwin. What was his whole idea about religion and
god and the first place? These are
interesting points to ponder. The
evidence suggested by Charles Darwin is further proof that the bible is indeed
accurate that the whole world would be misled and curse god for their
pain. {Rev. 16:11}. If you ever meet a true Evolutionist you’ll
meet a hater of god.
BELIEVERS
AND EVOLUTION
Some
so-called believers would like to present themselves as intellectuals from a
world view standpoint. What seems to
concern them is that they look like fools to the scientific community. So indeed they start mixing evolution with
creation. Basically, they become
agnostic without even realizing it. {Rom
1:25} Truly an Evolutionist does not know what to believe, he just wants to
look smart to everyone else. It is
understandable that weakness in the faith would come. It is also prophesied in the bible that the
unbelievers will be given power over the believers. Do we see this happening? What’s being taught in your child’s school,
creation or evolution? To address a
person’s intellectual capacity is supreme above all. To appeal to his 
intellectual
vanity by the use of the very colorful vocabulary is very effective in
insulting his intelligence. It is also a
very effective smokescreen of entertainment in a battle of wits and both sides
of the debate has its scholars and clowns.
Truth however is not a battle of wits made up with confusing
arguments. Truth is simple if there is a
design there is a designer, so simple yet so true.
What made Charles Darwin turn against his faith?
He claims it was his study through observation.
Yet we could study Charles Darwin and the choices he made in belief
and what else could have affected his atheist viewpoint of the world?
Charles Darwin no doubt observed the world around him and in it he
saw hatred, death, war, people being born deformed, and more. As we mentioned earlier Satan was never part
of his equation. And indeed if god
was the only one to blame for everything then you have to come up with other
possibilities. This is exactly what
Charles Darwin did.
Consider the greater mind that Charles Darwin
is suggesting. This is a matter of mathematics that was not considered by his
superior intellectual skills. Today there are an estimated 7 billion people on
the earth. In Charles Darwin’s time the earth population was just reaching 1
billion. It is agreed the 2 minds are better than 1 so it would only be
reasonable that 7 billion minds would be better 
than
1 billion. Also consider that in the time of Christ Jesus the earth population
is an estimated 200,000+. So his evolutionary thought about advanced mind is a
preconceived thoughtless argument. This also explains our technological and
scientific advancements that was also predicted {Dan 12:4}
People who try to prove evolution have the agenda of disproving god. They do this via several different means like
discrediting the bible and pointing out contradictions within it. However, they fail to apply this to themselves.
Their theory of evolution has so many holes it would not hold the very
thickest substance of matter within a container.
A creationist will study and observe the world around him and concluded
facts based on laws given. An intellectual
will conclude if there is a law there is a law giver or lawmaker. An Evolutionist will study the same subject
matter yet he always ends his study prematurely with a law itself. It is like materialism giving honor to the creation
and not the creator. The fact that
there would be Evolutionist in the world is outlined in the bible. Paul, who was a writer in the bible, said that
every house is constructed by someone but he that constructed all things is
god. He also goes on to say that the
world is inexcusable because of the creation the surrounds them. {Hebrews 3:3-5} In order
for Satan to succeed he had to challenge this very basic fundamental and he
was able to accomplish this through Charles Darwin and other atheist through
a new belief called evolution. Confusing religions was not enough for him
because the people still had the excuse that they believed in god even if
they did not know exactly who he is. It is Satan’s agenda to get people to
curse God not just be unsure about the nature of God or what he requires.
He is able to accomplish this though atheist and evolution.
A TRUE
SCIENTIST AGENDA
The
person who truly believes in science and study of the natural world will gather
evidence and intelligence with no assumptions.
He or she will present them to their colleagues and students for
discussion and study. A true scientist
with no agenda understands that the variables are vast maybe to infinity. To make presumptuous conclusions like the
theory of evolution is unscientific and unfair especially when there’s little
or no evidence to support their theory.
For every piece of evidence the Evolutionist claim that it is proof for
disbelief in god there is a million upon millions of pieces of evidence to
conclude that there is an intelligent designer. In short a true scientist does
not need a theory only to study the marvelous world around him in awe and
amazement as it is suppose to. A theory insults the intellect of a true
scientist! No theory should be considered when collecting scientific data.
THEORIES
A theory is no more that a presumptuous conclusion that leads to self righteousness and lies. A person with a theory will only look to that data that which supports his theory and in essence escapes the truth. This is evident through many scientific experiments. Not to pick on any one group of people but years ago egg yoke [MM2] was considered bad for your health, now they are changing their minds. This is only possible because the 1st theory was not truthful. This is not alarming in the least because theories are changed on a regular basis because of the limited resources and knowledge and bias agendas. Self glorification is a major part in proving theories though manipulation of scientific data or just leaving some parts out all together. Another way of proving a biased theory is by not testing all aspects that should be tested and making a premature conclusion that supports the theory. The attitude of some is that the end justifies the means. They think they are right and they know they are right so it is ok to lie according to them.
Another
facet of a theory which is not as disputable is that while conducting study in
a certain field, you begin to observe patterns that lead to a possible
conclusion. It is only human to draw conclusions based on evidence. Yet a true
scientist will refrain from such weakness as it leads to wrong conclusions as
in the egg yolk study just mentioned. A true scientist will present the
evidence and his job ends there. It is not his job to draw an absolute
conclusion for belief or disbelief! Nor is it the job of the scientist to
promote his personal viewpoint as truth as this also leads to false
conclusions. His job is only to present evidence discovered, no more and no
less. Truth and factual evidence is what matters - not his or her egotistical
or intellectual vanity or self justification.
Consider a further thought on the subject of eggs
and health and faith. If someone cannot tell you 
truthfully
if something simple as an egg yolk is good for you or not then why would you
believe them when they told you that you came from monkeys? There are many very
simple things that science does not have the capacity to understand as of now.
Making conclusions based on science alone is stupid! If science is all you have
then you are a very lost individual.
EVOLUTION
IN A NUTSHELL
According to Charles Darwin evolution is the
luck of the draw, just a chance that all the conditions were right for life to
exist and so it did. Let us examine this
more closely. Let’s consider the steps
in evolution that the Evolutionist are having faith
in. In a nutshell they claim that
everything started as a dot no bigger than a period on a sheet of paper. How the dot got there they do not claim to
know and they do not care to explain or theorize the possibility that was put
their by someone. This is going through
the assumption that everything started out as a dot. One of the next steps is for this dot to
explode to everything we see today. Do
you think that is faith? OK so now
everything exploded fro
m
the small dot into space, time, and matter all by itself. Next they believe that the earth was one of
the particles of the so-called big bang.
Now the planet earth according to them was hot from all the friction of
the big bang and somehow by chance it started raining on the earth to cool it
down for a billion years or so. Then
they expect you to believe that the rain caused all the oceans we see today. And then they expect you to believe that life
forms started to exist within the water all by themselves. Now think for a minute that all of this is
just happening, according to them there is no designer
just laws that govern the principles, yet there is no law giver. OK, according to them cells star
ted
to form in the water all by themselves.
Now in these cells that came from nowhere plant life started to emerge
and then fish life and this big story tale goes on and on to explain how we got
here. The fish turn into lizards, the
lizards turned into monkeys, and the monkeys turned into humans. If that’s not blind faith, what is?
BIGOTRY
For
Evolutionist like Charles Darwin they claim that bigotry is also another issue
with creationist. They frustratingly
proclaim that god is the creationist explanation for all the unexplained
reasons. It is true that when a
creationist find something that he cannot explain he gives the credit to an
intelligent designer who has wisdom far superior above that of his own. This in turn straightens his faith in his
belief in the mysteries of god. In turn
when an Evolutionist comes to a point where he has something that is
unexplained, in his mind you should give the credit to evolution. Some
Evolutionist explain the reason why they turn from god as an explanation is
because of the suffering. However, they
always leave Satan out of the equation along with their own ignorance and
disbelief in god. Evolutionist will
readily admit that they don’t know even a fraction of what there is to know in
the universe. They usually bust out some
excuse pointing to suffering. However, when a creationist chooses to give the
credit to a marvelous designer the Evolutionist hate them for it with no just a
reason. Does an Evolutionist really believe
that they are far more evolved than the Creationist? It is silly to think so but, intellectually
speaking, that is precisely what they believe.
Should a creationist spend his time trying [MM3] to convince an agnostic Evolutionist of belief in god? Is it really that important that we save Evolutionist? Is it true that god makes vessels for an honorable purpose and some for a dishonorable purpose? Remember that the Evolutionist have an agenda and that agenda is to destroy faith in god. The proof of the matter is they are succeeding. One of their reasoning’s is “where is your god?” even though it is very clear that the true meaning of faith is the assured expectation of things hope for though realities not beheld. The word faith can be applied to either an Evolutionist or a Creationist. Both are expecting an outcome. Yet, which one has more evidence to support their belief?
BLIND FAITH
This in turn will lead us to our next explanation of blind faith. What is the meaning of “blind faith”? If a person has blind faith he will not educate himself with convincing arguments to be able to explain his faith. Moreover a person with blind faith does not know why they believe what they believe, they just do. It is easy for an Evolutionist to have blind faith because they believe they act out of instinct. Like the monkey who wants a banana according to Charles Darwin. Yet, both sides have individuals with blind faith. The infancy of man is apparent through blind faith [MM4] . Their desire to educate themselves is indeed a mystery to a person who understands conscious existence.
Could
it be that the further along mankind are allowed to continue the less
intelligent they are becoming? Did early
man already know that if you burned all the fossil fuels that it would create
adverse effects on the planet earth? How
about in the book of revelation where John says those will be destroyed who
destroy the earth? {Rev.11:18} Was this
an indication of what early man accomplished trying to preserve nature? The point to ponder is this, are we
destroying ourselves by destroying our planet through our lack of
intelligence? Was early man destroying
the planet? Although early man was
primitive according to popular opinion it is evident that they were far more
technologically advance them once thought.
Batteries, computers, light bulbs, and navigational equipment as well as
a host of other things have been discovered.
It is very evident that early man knew they had fallen from grace. In almost every culture you have people who
sacrifice to their god in one way shape or form. Where would this whole idea come from if we
all came from soup and nothing more like Evolutionist claim?
INCREASED
KNOWLEDGE
This will lead to a further explanation to the increase of knowledge. As we are well aware there are more people on
the earth today than there has ever been.
It is only logical that our advancement in knowledge and technology
would increase. Yet once again the
bible is Daniel chapter 12 predicted that this would happen. As you’re well aware two people can accomplish
more than one. Seven billion people
can come accomplish a lot more than seven million. The self assuming presumptuous and self righteous
man in his effort to prove evolution because of advancement in knowledge
[MM5]
fails
to consider the basic fundamentals of mathematics. His brain is no better than the man who lived
1000 years ago and the man who lived 1000 years ago has the same intellectual
capacity of a man 1000 years before him. The
fact that we’ve continued to educate our selves and our thirst for knowledge
through conscious existence is an evident demonstration of faith in intelligence
itself. If there is a design there
is a designer to convince one otherwise is an insult to intelligent faith
itself.
EARTH
POPULATION
Ironically this discussion in mathematics can
lead us to another fascinating discovery.
No doubt every year the population of the planet becomes more and more. Currently the estimation is around seven
billion people. If you would take that
number and mathematically calculate backwards you will realize that the
population gets less and less. The bible says we came from two people, a male
and female. Is that so hard to believe? It also says they were made from the dirt of
the earth. Is that so hard to
believe? It also said they were made by
an intelligent designer. Is that so hard
to believe?
POLITICS
AND EVOLUTION
The political arena of mankind plays an unfair
game through funding, greed, and power.
It is very evident that the political agenda is evolution. Consider the schools that are funded by the
government. Consider what is being
taught in your child’s school. The
ultimate question is “why?” why is the political agenda evolution? If indeed people can be convinced that there
is no god the government itself becomes the ultimate power. The government’s agenda is to unite of
mankind into one faith. They do blame
god or the thought of god for their wounds, woes, and frustrations. In the figment of their fairy tale imagination
they believe that the solution to their divisions in litigation is to eliminate
god.
GOD
DEFENDS HIMSELF?
So indeed if god exist you may ask, “Why doesn’t he
defend himself?” Have you looked in the sky at night and realize how
insignificant we are? Would that maker
of the stars and the universe feel compelled to defend himself against such
stupidity? The fact that he would
dignify individuals with conscious existence is indeed a marvel in itself. The fact that he 
would
let those people exist is indeed the proclamation of conscious existence with
free will. The significance is the fact
that you have the ability to choose. The
thought process is not one of physical or molecular design or instinct, it is
the ability of free will. To believe or
not to believe the choice is yours, this is the fairness of god! If, indeed, every person was guided via a
physical brain on a molecular level and all that entails your whole life is
meaningless. In fact if evolution were
true you really never made a choice out of love or consideration and
“compassion”, would never be a thought that actually entered your mind.
THE
FUTURE?
Evolution is here to stay and it will continually be fed. The astronomical points of its development will be looked upon with admiration by the entire world.
Evolution
is no more than satanic propaganda perpetuated through the imaginations of
demonic influences. The fact of the
matter is true evolution leaves god out of the equation. Mutations exist within creation as they
always have from the beginning. To
dazzle the mind and introduce it to a host of “what if” possibilities that
leave god out of the equation will never leave a mind at peace. In turn every individual who accepts an
agnostic viewpoint on life will remain lost in these self indulgent pleasures
of ignorance.
OUTRAGOUS
THEORIES
Evolutionist through their so-called science has
introduced many outrageous theories.
Including but not limited to a multi verse suggesting that our universe
is just part of a cluster of balls that are several universes and make up a
multi verse. These individuals do not
know where to stop and it is very 
evident
that they do not know where to begin.
They are willing to accept this as “truth” even though they accept that
they are lost. They take refuge in the
unexplained reasoning within themselves that if there were a god he would not
leave them lost. So the reality to them
that since they are lost, then evidently there is no god. The insignificance of their belief or
unbelief is incomprehensible to any logical standard of reasoning. In turn these people can ascertain the
possibility that there is a process outside their own thought process that in
turn is more meaningful in what can ever be imagined. Their super physiological and intellectual
vanity stumps their growth of intellectual prosperity to the point where their
comprehension becomes an acceptable incomprehension. In turn they themselves are guilty of
hypocrisy because they claim that the bible is no more in man’s imaginations at
work, what may we ask are they proposing?
It may seem from an Evolutionist Point of view that this would be an
admission of guilt for a creationist to use this argument. Yet this is merely a hyperbole to illustrate
the jealousy of a true Evolutionist. The
bigotry of an Evolutionist is illustrated by their passion to prove “nothing”.
TRUE
EVOLUTIONIST
The
importance of using the term “true Evolutionist” is imperative when explaining
concepts. Most people who claim to be Evolutionist
do not realize the outrageous theories behind it. The prolonged belief of evolution keeps
changing and to some individuals they find freedom in the concept that they can
change their mind, the right to choose, conscious existence, god given free
will. This is an ironic antonym within
itself because they resent the framework of their whole belief system. To them all your thought 
process is
a neurological, biochemical, physiological reaction. In fact, according to evolution you really
never had a conscious existence of free will.
You have made all your decisions based solely on the physical world
around you and your physical makeup.
Everything that did happen was going to happen and everything that is
going to happen is as good as already happened.
Even the thought that ascertained in conjunction with the term “change
your mind” is a spiritual thought provoking mind boggling question.
The self
indulgent manipulation of illogical reasoning’s is praised by the evolutionary
community and their hidden agenda to proclaim the status of nothing. It is imperative that blind trust in this
theory is not only dangerous but can cost you and will cost you everything that
has been meaningful or ever will be meaningful in your life. It is important that you believe in reality
of truth and that you realize that this is not for the sake of god but is for
the sake of your very soul. In god you
have the true freedom to change your mind to take the road to the left or to
the right. You will prove the truth of
god’s existence whether you believe in him or not. For my part I would like to see your soul
saved, I would hate to see you where Charles Darwin is right now on either side
of the spectrum. If you are afraid to
look stupid then educate yourself.
FAKE PEOPLE
Out of all the people pretending to know something instead of actually knowing it Evolutionist are the guiltiest. They love to deceive for themselves and others. Somehow the thought of introducing the figments of the imagination for truth seems immoral and wrong.
To introduce the concept of freedom of thought would be nothing more than an imaginative anomaly that cannot be explained to an evolutionist.
Evolution is no more than mere entertainment to dazzle the mind like the SCI Fi channel. The inequities of man are promulgated by selfish longings and sinful desire. The tangible evidence that god exist is also realized through the passion of evolution to eliminate the very thought of god.
The fact that we can change our minds because of conscious existence is apparent that we came from someone who has the ability to change their mind namely, god. If we are made in his image, the apparent explanation of freedom of choice and conscious existence is explained to us in revealing our very substance of spiritual mind, made in the image of god himself.
Spiritual
mind [MM6] is
something that Charles Darwin could not comprehend; his study was limited as is
all science to the study of the natural and physical world around us. Although the study or science in particular,
leads us to more questions than answers then it should be apparent that every
person lives by faith. You have faith
that the sun will rise again tomorrow, faith that you can breathe your next
breath, and the list of things that you naturally have faith in continues to
grow without even considering the consequences of its absence.
It is the constitution of the Evolutionist to proclaim an atheistic viewpoint
of the world. It has been brought to
the attention of individuals that they should give honor to inventors for
their inventions. So since some of
these inventors are atheist, and having been given the intellectual capacity
for inventions of new technology that we should consider an atheistic viewpoint
ourselves. Basically to sum it up layman’s
terms, they are smart so we should believe what they believe. This is no more than an Evolutionist effort
to gain more control over the popular vote.
According to this perspective, it would benefit an individual to accept
Christianity because Jesus Christ is of course the smartest person who ever
lived. Consider that the preceding
inventors can invent things made with hands such as computers, cars and trucks,
satellites, etc. The latter gives us
such things as peace, love, forgiveness, hope, everlasting life, and much
more. This is not to mention the fact
that not all inventors are Evolutionist. This
assumption is altogether wrong in itself and anyone who uses such an argument
is not wise. Everyone knows there’s
good and evil in mankind and there are smart people who are good and there
are smart people who are evil.
THE
Just because one would prove superior in a battle of wits does not necessarily
make them right. To articulate speech
no doubt is a talent but many evil men have possessed this talent to the destruction
of man. The idea that one is intellectually
superior because of their speaking ability is ludicrous. And the thought that since one invents something
clever and useful that he is intellectually superior in all aspects of life
is insane. The variables of life and
belief and science go to infinity and beyond. Any conclusions drawn would only be temporary
concerning any subject at any given time. Science is limited and it is inconceivable that
one can erase all thought and assumptions when carrying out a scientific experiment.
Although through analysis we can become more accurate it is impossible
to make an absolute conclusion.
THE ENVY
OF TRUE SCIENTISTS
The envy of a true scientist is the thought of “nothing” and indeed to this end he shall devote his life because he knows that all of this did come from “nothing”. It is amazing that someone can actually make something from nothing and to this end forever the question is not how but who? The big perplexing question is “How do they start from nothing?” In every experiment of science the scientist himself tries to eliminate all variables to begin with so that he can start with nothing and build upon it. It is to this end if they conclude that everything came from nothing. Yet, they cannot take their own intelligence out of the equation of the experiment itself. The frustration of science is that they cannot study god. In fact science cannot study anything truly that they cannot see, feel, hear, smell or touch. It would be better for all of us if they did not include their imaginations in their “Scientific Data Collections”.
©
I am
releasing this work as it is made for comments and criticism.